:: [print] NULL ::
HOME


[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]

[print] NULL


Title: HCW 03 Review Registration Form


Comments to authors. Either place the comments in the text box, or upload an ASCII file containing your comments.
Comments File


Comments for PC members only. Either place the comments in the text box, or upload an ASCII file containing your comments.
PC Comments File

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: Your paper.

Shashank,

would you please review the following paper and discuss it with me in our next

meeting. This has been submitted to a workshop on Heterogeneous Processing. I
am attaching a review form as well. Please format your comments accordingly
and then we can discuss them further.

Thanks
Ashfaq



HCW 03

Paper Review Form

Use this form to submit a review for paper

2 : High Data Rate Video Transmission Using Parallel TCP Connections: Approaches and Performance Evaluat

Please remember that the review is needed by 22 November, 2002



Reviewer Name
For the next six queries , please rate the paper on a scale of 1-4, where the quality increases as the number increases.

Originality
Technical merit
Readability
Relevance
Confidence in your review
Overall rating

Recommended action

REJECT
Weak REJECT
Weak ACCEPT
ACCEPT

Attachment: block-decomposition.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Title: HCW 03 Review Registration Form


Comments to authors. Either place the comments in the text box, or upload an ASCII file containing your comments.
Comments File


Comments for PC members only. Either place the comments in the text box, or upload an ASCII file containing your comments.
PC Comments File


HCW 03

Paper Review Form

Use this form to submit a review for paper

2 : High Data Rate Video Transmission Using Parallel TCP Connections: Approaches and Performance Evaluat

Please remember that the review is needed by 22 November, 2002



Reviewer Name
For the next six queries , please rate the paper on a scale of 1-4, where the quality increases as the number increases.

Originality
Technical merit
Readability
Relevance
Confidence in your review
Overall rating

Recommended action

REJECT
Weak REJECT
Weak ACCEPT
ACCEPT